Saved by His Humanity, Not His Maleness

This is Father Jared Cramer from St. John’s Episcopal Church in Grand Haven, Michigan, here with today’s edition of Christian Mythbusters, a regular segment I offer to counter some common misconceptions about the Christian faith.

Last week I talked about the myth that God is a man—and why Christian theology has always known that God transcends gender entirely. Today I want to go deeper, because some listeners pushed back with an obvious question: “But Jesus was a man, wasn't he?” And yes—historically, he was. So, what do we do with that?

This brings us to today's myth: the myth that because Jesus was male, maleness must be closer to God, some key part of the divine inner life, or more capable of representing the divine.

To untangle this, I want to introduce you to one of the most important theological principles in all of Christian history. It comes from St. Gregory of Nazianzus, writing around 382 AD: “That which he did not assume, he cannot save.” In other words, for Christ to redeem humanity, he had to take on full human nature—not just a body, but a mind, a will, emotions, and all the complexity of what it means to be a person. Gregory was arguing against those who thought Jesus only seemed human, or was human in only a partial way. No, Gregory insisted: the redemption of the whole person requires the incarnation of the whole person.

Now here's where it gets interesting. If the saving power of the incarnation flows from Christ's humanity—from his taking on the full depth of human experience—then what follows? It follows that his maleness was a feature of his historical particularity, not the theological engine of salvation.

Feminist theologians have been making this exact point for decades. While Jesus' male sex was as intrinsic to his historical particularity as were his Jewish race, his Galilean village roots, his class, and his ethnic heritage, it reveals nothing about the nature or gender of God, nor about the appropriateness of male images for the divine. Jesus was also a first-century Palestinian Jew who wore sandals and spoke Aramaic. We don't conclude from that that God is Aramaic-speaking—or that Galileans are somehow closer to the divine. As Elizabeth Johnson put it, “The heart of the problem is not that Jesus was male, but that more males have not been like Jesus.”

The point is this: the incarnation saves because God entered fully into human life—into vulnerability, suffering, love, and death. The redemptive power is in the depth of that union, not in the gender of the vessel.

And if that's true, then Gregory's maxim cuts in an unexpected direction. If the unassumed is the unhealed, then a Christ who only assumed male humanity would leave the rest of humanity—women, nonbinary people, anyone who doesn't fit the narrow category of male—somehow outside the full reach of salvation. Christian theology has sometimes dignified maleness as the only genuine way of being human, making Jesus' embodiment as male an ontological necessity rather than a historical option. But that's not the Gospel. That's a distortion of it.

The good news—and it really is good news—is that what Christ assumed was humanity itself, in its full breadth and depth. And that means the healing of the incarnation extends to every human being: women, men, and people of every gender identity. All of it was assumed. All of it is being redeemed.

This is why the diversity of human gender and identity is not a threat to Christian faith. It is, if anything, a reminder of the vastness of what God entered into—and the vastness of what God is saving. The mystery of human embodiment in all its variety doesn't shrink the Gospel. It reveals how wide the incarnation truly is.

Gregory of Nazianzus wanted us to take the incarnation seriously. So let's do that—all the way to its most expansive, most healing conclusion.

Thanks for being with me. To find out more about my parish, you can go to sjegh.com. Until next time, remember: protest like Jesus, love recklessly, and live your faith out in a community that accepts you but also challenges you to be better tomorrow than you are today.