The Bible Was Never Meant to Be Read Flat | Better Ways to Read the Bible | Chad Belew

"The Bible says it, I believe it, that settles it." It sounds confident and faithful, but Chad names what that posture actually does: it shuts down curiosity and conversation. Drawing on Zach Lambert's Better Ways to Read the Bible, this week looks at the literalism lens — the modern habit of flattening poetry, parable, and story into one-dimensional commands, and the way inerrancy got weaponized to gatekeep who belongs. From bald-mocking bears to snake-handling churches to a food pantry that asked for a signed doctrinal statement before letting the hungry be fed, Chad makes the case that the problem isn't the Bible; it's how we've been taught to read it. What makes a reading sacred isn't how literal it is — it's how much love it produces.

In this episode:

- Why "the Bible says it, I believe it, that settles it" closes the conversation instead of opening it

- The literalism lens: reading a love poem like a legal document (2 Kings 2, Mark 9, Mark 16)

- Where inerrancy actually came from — the 1978 Chicago Statement and whose voices wrote it

- The food-pantry story: when love has to sign theological fine print before it's let in

- Genesis 1–3 isn't a science report; it asks whether God is worthy of worship

- "Every time God forgives, relationship matters more than the rules" — and a practice for reading with fresh eyes this week

—

The Arsenal | San Antonio, TX

???? thearsenal.church

???? Download the Arsenal Church app

???? Questions or need prayer? hello@thearsenal.church

???? Give: thearsenal.church/give